A practical spreadsheet tool designed to help cataract surgeons calculate and monitor surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), record IOL selections, and track postoperative visual outcomes — all in one place.
A practical spreadsheet tool designed to help cataract surgeons calculate and monitor surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), record IOL selections, and track postoperative visual outcomes — all in one place.
Most legacy SIA calculators rely on outdated Excel features no longer compatible with current software. The ASCRS calculator remains functional but is limited to corneal data only.
This spreadsheet was developed to address those gaps: it supports broader surgical and refractive outcome analysis, allows exclusion of cases with relevant ocular pathology or complications, and is continuously updated with new features.

Current lens selection with updated classification according to the ESCRS European guidelines.
| Firm | Model | Optic type | Filter | Toric model exists? | Aberration | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoya | Vivinex | monofocal (Partial RoF Narrow) | Transparent | NO | -0.22 | |
| Zeiss | 621 | monofocal (Partial RoF Narrow) | Transparent | NO | Negative | Behaves like monofocal plus |
| Ophtec | Precizon | monofocal (Partial RoF Narrow) | Transparent | Yes | 0 | |
| Johnson & Johnson | PCB00 | monofocal (Partial RoF Narrow) | Transparent | Yes | -0.27 | |
| Johnson & Johnson | Eyhance | monofocal plus (Partial RoF Enhance) | Transparent | Yes | -0.27 | Only powers >24 and high corneal aberration |
| Ophtec | Precizon Go | monofocal plus (Partial RoF Enhance) | Transparent | Yes | 0 | Only powers >24 |
| BVI | Isopure Serenity | Monofocal plus (Partial RoF Enhance) | Yellow | Yes | ? | Any power but corneal aberration >0.30 |
| Johnson & Johnson | PureSee | EDOF (Partial RoF Extend) | Transparent | Yes | -0.27 | |
| BVI | Finevision PODF | Trifocal (Full RoF Smooth Transition) | Transparent | Yes | -0.11 | |
| ZEISS | ELANA | Trifocal (Full RoF Continuous Transition) | Transparent | NO | 0 | |
| Johnson & Johnson | Odyssey | Trifocal (Full RoF Continuous Transition) | Transparent | Yes | -0.27 |
There are several formulas for guessing the best lens power. Some of them have to be previously calculated, some of them can be done on the spot.
One of the most popular rules is the “rule of the 9s”2: decrease 0.5dp from the intended power for each 9dp away from 0. Check the table below these lines:
| Original IOL Power | Adjustment for sulcus IOL Power |
| < 9 dp | None |
| 9 to 18 dp | -0.5 dp |
| 18 to 27 dp | -1 dp |
| > 27 dp | -1.5 dp |
| Optics captured in bag and haptics in sulcus | None |
However, you still to need to account for the lens constant and consider if you are going to capture the optic body or not. Recent studies show that lenses with captured body should use traditional formulas for lens-in-the-bag.
Though the rule of the nines is a huge improvement over the “decrease by 1dp” to power of the lens for sulcus placement1. However, it does have a flaw: it’s an approximation. If we could have a proper sulculs lens power calculator, using the emmetropia value and apply the proper correction (not the 9s rule) we would get better results. That’s is exactly what the Sulcus calculator in our app, Cataractools, does.
Suto C, Hori S, Fukuyama E, Akura J. Adjusting intraocular lens power for sulcus fixation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1913-7. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00250-5. PMID: 14604710.
The Rule of Nines for Sulcus IOL Power. Professor Uday Devgan MD